ISPs as child porn watchdogs? A bill on its way to President Clinton could make Net access providers responsible for policing their services for child pornography. H1-B bill could get reprieve Legislation to almost double the number of highly skilled tech workers allowed into the country may escape sudden death. Senate OKs lawsuit curbs With high tech in mind, senators pass legislation to rein in shareholder suits against companies with volatile stock prices. Tech bills hang in the balance roundup Legislation to govern an array of Net and technology issues must be voted on quickly as Congress's session comes to a close.
CNET también está disponible en español, Don't show this again, The president is expected to sign Rep, Mike Oxley's (R-Ohio) bill, which requires commercial site operators who offer "harmful" material to either check visitors' identifications or face up to $50,000 in fines and six months in prison each time a minor gets access to the content, The American Civil Liberties Union, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the Center for Democracy and Technology all said today that they will file a lawsuit to overturn the statute almost immediately kajsa briquette collection sphere iphone xs max case - peach after Clinton signs the bill, The plaintiffs will includemusicians, artists, and online news companies, including CNET: The Computer Network, publisher of News.Com..
"These bills get passed in the guise of protecting children--in fact, they censor adults," Chris Hansen, senior staff counsel to the ACLU, said today. "This will unconstitutionally restrict adults' access to a wide range of material," he added. "And it's not even effective because no overseas-based site has to comply with it at all.". It is hardly a surprise that Oxley's bill is on its way to being signed into law. Proponents of the bill, such as Sen. DanCoats (R-Indiana), who introduced his own version of it, have beenworking just about every angle to get it passed. And the omnibus budget bill expected to clear Congress ended up being a bullet-proof vehicle.
The political process this week almost is an instant replay of what happened in 1996 when the massive telecommunications deregulation act was signed, It included an infamous provision of the Communications Decency Act that made it a felony to transmit or display any "indecent" material on the Net that could be accessed by minors, As it did with the CDA, Congress pushed the Oxley legislation with the goal of protecting children kajsa briquette collection sphere iphone xs max case - peach from the Net's red-light districts, However, the Justice Department forewarned that the bill would be challenged because it is vague and could hinder adult access toconstitutionally protected speech, Still, President Clinton is set to give in because the Net content bill is once again a part of a critical legislative package..
Before the ink could dry on the CDA, free speech advocates filed a lawsuit to get it scrapped, and they won. In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court struck down that portion of the CDA last June. Civil liberties groups already are set to file a similar challenge to the Child Online Protection Act, which they call the CDA II. The groups will argue that the statute could stifle adults' access to an array of Web sites, chat rooms, or email that contain information about art, science, medicine, or sex. One high-profile example being thrownout is the slew of Web sites that published the Starr report, which includes former White House intern Monica Lewinsky's graphic descriptions of her sexualencounters with President Clinton.
Copyright © 2020 www.acquadifirenze.it. All Rights Reserved